stevedlawrence commented on code in PR #1432: URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/1432#discussion_r1958686935
########## .github/actions/asf-release-candidate/action.yml: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more Review Comment: It's only been a few days, but there doesn't seem much interest by INFRA to include the action in infrastructure-actions. Infra is usually pretty busy so I imagine it's no high priority. So I suggest for now we keep the action in a `daffodil-*` repo, and if ASF ever does show interest we can can always migrate to that version. Also, maybe seeing it in action would make it a bit more appealing. Any thoughts on where it should live in the meantime? Previously I proposed a new repo called daffodil-infrastructure--something that is not so user focused like daffodil-extra, but is more focused on things the various daffodil repos can share for releases, CI, etc. Thoughts? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
