Gabriel39 opened a new pull request, #64435:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/64435
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: None
Related PR: None
Problem Summary: ColumnMapper coverage was scattered across file reader and
table reader tests, and several mapper-specific behaviors were not asserted
directly. This adds a dedicated format_v2 ColumnMapper unit test file with
categorized coverage for schema projection helpers, nested helper behavior,
root mapping modes, constant and virtual mappings, scan request localization,
complex projection pruning, and split-local schema evolution state. It migrates
existing root mapping, BY_INDEX, and constant filter entry cases into
column_mapper_test.cpp so mapper semantics are covered in one focused file, and
adjusts existing nested projection assertions to match the mapper's current
scan projection contract.
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test: Attempted unit test
- Unit Test: attempted
`JDK_17=/usr/local/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home
JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/opt/openjdk@17/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home
./run-be-ut.sh --run --filter='ColumnMapper*:*TableColumnMapper*'`; the BE UT
build failed before running tests because this worktree thirdparty installation
is missing `thirdparty/installed/bin/protoc` and Snappy.
- Behavior changed: No
- Does this need documentation: No
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should
merge into -->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]