wenzhenghu commented on PR #65126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65126#issuecomment-5091795706

   Review follow-up summary, audited against the current head 
`2266c7ef964fb4b63c3c786c9f562468c89c558f`:
   
   - I reviewed all 25 inline review threads across the 39 submitted reviews, 
together with the follow-up findings raised in PR comments. All 25 inline 
threads are currently resolved.
   - The correctness and regression findings were addressed in code, including 
cache-only replay fallback, canonical invalidation, cold-event generation 
fencing, delegated-session point lookup, per-key object/ID publication 
ordering, named replay with disabled object caches, and lazy `StripeState` 
allocation.
   - Findings that describe intentional eventual-consistency boundaries were 
handled by clarifying the PR description and code comments. In particular, 
old-generation work must not publish, while a refresh that starts after the 
generation bump or overlaps invalidation may still publish under the accepted 
Caffeine semantics. The PR does not claim full global invalidation 
linearizability.
   - Larger or baseline follow-ups remain tracked independently: #65750 for the 
remaining HMS event consistency gaps, #65779 for names-snapshot and 
selective-invalidation performance, #65792 for unified cache statistics, #66001 
for global invalidation ordering, and #66024 for the pre-existing 
`MetaInfoAction` privilege-filtering issue.
   
   I also compared the latest PR head with the last metadata-cache 
implementation commit. The final merge from `master` only changed `fe/pom.xml` 
and `fe/fe-core/pom.xml`; it did not touch the metadata-cache production code 
or related tests. Static inspection found no regression or weakening of the 
fixes accepted in the resolved review threads.
   
   This was a static regression audit only; no UT or checkstyle run is claimed 
for the latest head in this follow-up.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to