airborne12 opened a new pull request, #67363:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67363

   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: N/A
   
   Related PR: #67327 (which backported #65821 and introduced this suite)
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   `test_search_score_topn_predicates` fails intermittently on the shared P0 
pipeline of branch-4.1. It always fails on its very first query (line 59), 
right after `CREATE TABLE` + `INSERT` + `sync`, with:
   
   ```
   errCode = 2, detailMessage = [INTERNAL_ERROR]SearchExpr should not be 
executed without inverted index
   ```
   
   Observed on branch-4.1 CI, 2 failures out of 4 runs — builds `1034808` (PR 
#67327) and `1035495` (PR #67342) failed, while `1035120` (rerun of #67327, 
identical code, 5530 tests passed) and `1035335` (PR #67340, after the suite 
landed) passed. At roughly a 50% hit rate it randomly reddens unrelated 
branch-4.1 PRs, so it needs to stop running in the concurrent P0 group.
   
   The case is not wrong on its own: it passes locally against both a 1-BE and 
a 3-BE cluster built from this branch, and the CI rerun with identical code 
passed as well. That points at contention on the shared P0 runner (the index of 
the freshly inserted rowset not being usable yet at query time) rather than at 
the query. branch-4.1 also lacks master's `prevent_search_row_fallback` path 
(added by #66052 together with the SNII format), so on this branch a search 
that does not take the index surfaces the internal error directly instead of 
falling back.
   
   Fix: move the suite to the `nonConcurrent` group so it runs serialized, as 
35 other `inverted_index_p0` cases on this branch already do. No test logic or 
expected output changes.
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
       - [x] Regression test
       - [ ] Unit Test
       - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
       - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
           - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
           - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
           - [ ] No code files have been changed.
           - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->
   
   - Behavior changed:
       - [x] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
   
   - Does this need documentation?
       - [x] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: 
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should 
merge into -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to