yujun777 commented on code in PR #68648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68648#discussion_r4269423241
##########
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/nereids/trees/plans/commands/UpdateMvByPartitionCommand.java:
##########
@@ -130,17 +142,69 @@ private static List<String>
constructPartsForMv(Set<String> partitionNames) {
return Lists.newArrayList(partitionNames);
}
+ /**
+ * The predicate every base table of the MV definition is read through.
+ *
+ * <p>A table the caller scopes is read from exactly the base partitions
it named. Those are the ones
+ * the refresh is about to record as this MV partition's, and the read is
what has to match the record:
+ * reading the MV partition's own key range instead also reads base
partitions no snapshot describes,
+ * and a later silent change to one of them -- dropped, with the base
partition set back to what it
+ * was -- leaves the rows it put in this MV partition behind while the
partition is still judged
+ * synchronized, so the transparent rewrite serves them and no refresh
plans it again.
+ *
+ * <p>Every other table keeps the MV partition's own key range, which is
what the tables the caller
+ * does not scope were always read through. Scoped tables are olap ones;
the partition names are
+ * looked up on one, see the caller.
+ */
private static Map<TableIf, Set<Expression>>
constructTableWithPredicates(MTMV mv,
- Set<String> partitionNames, Map<TableIf, String> tableWithPartKey)
throws AnalysisException {
- Set<PartitionItem> items = Sets.newHashSet();
+ Set<String> partitionNames, Map<TableIf, String> tableWithPartKey,
+ Map<BaseTableInfo, Set<String>> readableBasePartitions) throws
AnalysisException {
+ Set<PartitionItem> mvItems = Sets.newHashSet();
for (String partitionName : partitionNames) {
- PartitionItem partitionItem =
mv.getPartitionItemOrAnalysisException(partitionName);
- items.add(partitionItem);
+ mvItems.add(mv.getPartitionItemOrAnalysisException(partitionName));
}
ImmutableMap.Builder<TableIf, Set<Expression>> builder = new
ImmutableMap.Builder<>();
- tableWithPartKey.forEach((table, colName) ->
- builder.put(table, constructPredicates(items, colName))
- );
+ for (Map.Entry<TableIf, String> entry : tableWithPartKey.entrySet()) {
+ TableIf table = entry.getKey();
+ String colName = entry.getValue();
+ Set<String> readable = readableBasePartitions == null ? null
+ : readableBasePartitions.get(new BaseTableInfo(table));
+ if (readable == null) {
+ builder.put(table, constructPredicates(mvItems, colName));
+ continue;
+ }
+ OlapTable olapTable = (OlapTable) table;
+ Set<PartitionItem> items = Sets.newHashSet();
+ for (String partitionName : readable) {
+
items.add(olapTable.getPartitionItemOrAnalysisException(partitionName));
+ }
+ if (items.stream().anyMatch(PartitionItem::isDefaultPartition)) {
+ // One of the partitions this MV partition is recorded with is
a list partitioned table's
+ // default partition, which takes the rows no other partition
of it claims. Those rows are
+ // the ones the MV partition's own key range names, wherever
the base table put them, and a
+ // partition of the MV takes them by that key rather than by
the partition they were placed
+ // in. So a table whose mapped partitions include one is read
the way an unscoped one is:
+ // the MV partition's key range, at the partition column's own
type. Which of the rows that
+ // range reaches sit in an explicit partition and which in the
default one is not something a
+ // predicate on the partition columns can say -- ADD PARTITION
claims a key without moving the
+ // rows a default partition already holds under it -- so this
table is not scoped at all, and
+ // the mapping is kept whole for it for the same reason: see
+ // MTMVRelatedPartitionDescSyncLimitGenerator, which leaves
such a table out of the window.
+ // The mapping names the default partition in every MV
partition that reads the table, so this
+ // is reached for each of them and not only for the one the
sentinel key maps to.
+ builder.put(table, constructPredicates(mvItems, colName,
+ Optional.of(partitionColumnType(olapTable, colName))));
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (readable.isEmpty()) {
+ // No partition of this table feeds the MV partitions being
refreshed, which is "no row"
+ // rather than "every row": constructPredicates answers the
other way for an empty set,
+ // and that answer would put every row of the table into each
of them.
+ builder.put(table, Sets.newHashSet(BooleanLiteral.FALSE));
+ continue;
+ }
+ builder.put(table, constructPredicatesOfBasePartitions(items,
olapTable, colName));
Review Comment:
The RANGE refresh test is in 7eefa2bb80b:
`mtmv_p0/test_mtmv_base_partition_read_scope` now builds a `DATETIME(3)` range
partition of `[2024-01-01 00:00:00.123, 2025-01-01 00:00:00.123)` under a
year-granularity MV, inserts a row inside the partition on both sides of the MV
partition's upper bound (`2024-12-31 23:59:59.999` and `2025-01-01
00:00:00.100`), refreshes, and records the result -- the row inside the MV
partition alone.
Both directions were measured on a local cluster. With the MV partition's
own range left out of the scoped read:
```
MTMVTask.executePartitionBasedRefresh():1333 Execution failed after retries,
mvName: range_ms_boundary_mv
errCode = 2, detailMessage = Insert has filtered data in strict mode.
first_error_msg: no partition for this tuple.
tuple=[{"ts(DateTimeV2(3))":"2025-01-01
00:00:00.100","(Nullable(BIGINT))":"2"}]
```
-- the task is FAILED and the suite fails; with the range in place the suite
passes, and the whole suite's other sections are unchanged.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
