kfaraz commented on code in PR #18207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/18207#discussion_r2238425881
##########
embedded-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/druid/testing/embedded/compact/AutoCompactionTest.java:
##########
@@ -1742,84 +1639,85 @@ public void
testAutoCompactionDutyWithOverlappingInterval() throws Exception
);
// Compact the MONTH segment
forceTriggerAutoCompaction(2);
- verifyQuery(INDEX_ROLLUP_QUERIES_RESOURCE, queryAndResultFields);
+ verifyScanResult("added", "57.0||459.0");
+ verifyScanResult("COUNT(*)", "2");
// Compact the WEEK segment
forceTriggerAutoCompaction(2);
- verifyQuery(INDEX_ROLLUP_QUERIES_RESOURCE, queryAndResultFields);
+ verifyScanResult("added", "57.0||459.0");
+ verifyScanResult("COUNT(*)", "2");
// Verify all task succeed
- List<TaskResponseObject> compactTasksBefore =
indexer.getCompleteTasksForDataSource(fullDatasourceName);
- for (TaskResponseObject taskResponseObject : compactTasksBefore) {
- Assert.assertEquals(TaskState.SUCCESS, taskResponseObject.getStatus());
+ List<TaskStatusPlus> compactTasksBefore =
getCompleteTasksForDataSource(fullDatasourceName);
+ for (TaskStatusPlus taskResponseObject : compactTasksBefore) {
+ Assertions.assertEquals(TaskState.SUCCESS,
taskResponseObject.getStatusCode());
}
// Verify compacted segments does not get compacted again
forceTriggerAutoCompaction(2);
- List<TaskResponseObject> compactTasksAfter =
indexer.getCompleteTasksForDataSource(fullDatasourceName);
- Assert.assertEquals(compactTasksAfter.size(), compactTasksBefore.size());
+ List<TaskStatusPlus> compactTasksAfter =
getCompleteTasksForDataSource(fullDatasourceName);
+ Assertions.assertEquals(compactTasksAfter.size(),
compactTasksBefore.size());
}
}
- private void loadData(String indexTask) throws Exception
+ private <T extends TaskBuilder.IndexCommon<?, ?, ?>> void
loadData(Supplier<T> updatePayload)
{
- loadData(indexTask, ImmutableMap.of());
+ loadData(updatePayload, null);
}
- private void loadData(String indexTask, Map<String, Object> specs) throws
Exception
+ private <T extends TaskBuilder.IndexCommon<?, ?, ?>> void loadData(
+ Supplier<T> taskPayloadSupplier,
+ GranularitySpec granularitySpec
+ )
{
- String taskSpec = getResourceAsString(indexTask);
- taskSpec = StringUtils.replace(taskSpec, "%%DATASOURCE%%",
fullDatasourceName);
- taskSpec = StringUtils.replace(
- taskSpec,
- "%%SEGMENT_AVAIL_TIMEOUT_MILLIS%%",
- jsonMapper.writeValueAsString("0")
- );
- for (Map.Entry<String, Object> entry : specs.entrySet()) {
- taskSpec = StringUtils.replace(
- taskSpec,
- entry.getKey(),
- jsonMapper.writeValueAsString(entry.getValue())
- );
+ final TaskBuilder.IndexCommon<?, ?, ?> taskBuilder =
taskPayloadSupplier.get();
+ taskBuilder.dataSource(fullDatasourceName);
+ if (granularitySpec != null) {
+ taskBuilder.granularitySpec(granularitySpec);
}
- final String taskId = indexer.submitTask(taskSpec);
- LOG.info("Submitted task[%s] to load data", taskId);
- indexer.waitUntilTaskCompletes(taskId);
- ITRetryUtil.retryUntilTrue(
- () -> coordinator.areSegmentsLoaded(fullDatasourceName),
- "Segments are loaded"
+ runTask(taskBuilder, fullDatasourceName);
+ }
+
+ private void verifyQuery(List<Pair<String, String>> queries)
+ {
+ queries.forEach(
+ query -> verifyQuery(query.lhs, query.rhs)
);
}
- private void verifyQuery(String queryResource) throws Exception
+ private void verifyQuery(String query, String result)
{
- verifyQuery(queryResource, ImmutableMap.of());
+ Assertions.assertEquals(
+ result,
+ cluster.runSql(query, dataSource),
+ StringUtils.format("Query[%s] failed", query)
+ );
}
- private void verifyQuery(String queryResource, Map<String, Object>
keyValueToReplace) throws Exception
+ /**
+ * Verifies the result of a SELECT query
+ *
+ * @param field Field to select
+ * @param result CSV result with special strings {@code ||} to represent
Review Comment:
Yeah, I didn't want to do this initially, but it made for more readable
tests as it avoided all the escaping of empty strings and newlines.
```java
verifyScanResult("added", "...||31||...||62");
```
vs
```java
verifyScanResult("added", "\"\"\n31\"\"\n62");
```
Please let me know if it is cleaner to just use the original.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]