suneet-s commented on a change in pull request #11016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/11016#discussion_r605294614



##########
File path: docs/operations/security-overview.md
##########
@@ -264,3 +318,29 @@ As an alternative to using the basic metadata 
authenticator, as shown in the pre
 
 
 Congratulations, you have configured permissions for user-assigned roles in 
Druid!
+
+
+## Druid security trust model
+Like all other security systems, trust is the foundation of the Druid security 
model. Druid administrators and read-only users are trusted users. Therefore, 
they are not expected to act maliciously.

Review comment:
       @techdocsmith It is possible that a security flaw can be exploited where 
a read only user elevates their permissions. This would be a very serious 
attack vector, so having a security model that says a read only user should not 
act maliciously seems counter-intuitive to me.
   
   All security flaws are because someone is acting maliciously. The question 
then is what are the levels of defense in the system. That's what I thought a 
security trust model is.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to