This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

cdutz pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-blazeds.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new 895277c  - Got a first working version of sub-crux instances in 
modules working - Implemented a first working UI for the heating system
895277c is described below

commit 895277c20ab4a170d598796e74c761ded3d89373
Author: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
AuthorDate: Sun Sep 27 18:38:34 2020 +0200

    - Got a first working version of sub-crux instances in modules working
    - Implemented a first working UI for the heating system
---
 core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java    | 2 +-
 core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java 
b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
index f29fca7..3e05991 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public interface LoginCommand
      * The gateway calls this method to perform programmatic authorization.
      * <p>
      * A typical implementation would simply iterate over the supplied roles 
and
-     * check that atleast one of the roles returned true from a call to
+     * check that at least one of the roles returned true from a call to
      * HttpServletRequest.isUserInRole(String role).
      * </p>
      *
diff --git a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java 
b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
index 6078180..7bf159b 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ public interface LoginCommandExt
     /**
      * Classes that implement the flex.messaging.security.LoginCommand 
interface, should also
      * implement this interface if the name stored in java.security.Principal 
created as a result
-     * of a succesfull authentication differs from the username that is 
actually passed in to
+     * of a successful authentication differs from the username that is 
actually passed in to
      * the authentication.
      *
-     * Implementing this interace gives such LoginCommand's a chance to return 
the resulting
+     * Implementing this interface gives such LoginCommand's a chance to 
return the resulting
      * username so that it can be compared to the one stored in Principal.
      *
      * Returns the value that would be returned by 
java.security.Principal.getName() if

Reply via email to