zhztheplayer commented on code in PR #11492:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-gluten/pull/11492#discussion_r2731312830
##########
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yml:
##########
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ body:
attributes:
label: Bug description
description: Please describe the issue and the expected behavior.
- value: "[Expected behavior] and [actual behavior]."
+ value: "[Expected behavior] and [actual behavior]. If this issue was
written with the assistance of AI, please note that at the end of the
description."
Review Comment:
> But here, if it means issue description drafted or polished by AI tool, it
seems unnecessary to include such info to make people aware of that?
If I understand it correctly, say an issue is only polished by AI, the
author will still be human. In that case, we'd recommend to note that in issue
description, subject to whether the author thinks it's needed. Apparently,
using AI to fix typos and using AI to propose a solution are completely
different things, so we can barely draw a clear dividing line here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
