yuqi1129 commented on code in PR #11060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/11060#discussion_r3256249108


##########
docs/lance-rest-integration.md:
##########
@@ -22,12 +22,17 @@ The following table outlines the tested compatibility 
between Gravitino versions
 
 | Gravitino Version (Lance REST) | Supported lance-spark Versions | Supported 
lance-ray Versions |
 
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------|
-| 1.1.1 - 1.2.1                  | 0.0.10 - 0.0.15               | 0.0.6 - 
0.0.8                |
-| 1.3.0                          | 0.1.0 - 0.2.0                 | 0.0.6 - 
0.2.0                |
+| 1.1.1 - 1.2.1                  | 0.0.10 - 0.0.15                | 0.0.6 - 
0.0.8                |
+| 1.3.0                          | 0.1.0 - 0.4.0                  | 0.3.0 - 
0.4.2                |

Review Comment:
   Confirmed unsupported. Spun up Gravitino 1.3.0 (post-upgrade) and ran the 
lance-ray IT against each version with `lance-namespace==0.7.5` pinned. The 
PyPI install actually succeeds for all of these; the failures show up at 
runtime:
   
   - **0.1.0**: `TypeError: write_lance() got an unexpected keyword argument 
'namespace_impl'`. 0.1.0's `write_lance(...)` takes `namespace: LanceNamespace` 
directly; the IT (and 0.2.0+) use the new `namespace_impl: str` + 
`namespace_properties: dict` form, so the call doesn't even reach the server.
   - **0.2.0**: `ImportError: cannot import name 
'LanceNamespaceStorageOptionsProvider' from 'lance'`. The IT call signature 
matches, but `lance_ray.utils.create_storage_options_provider` does `from lance 
import LanceNamespaceStorageOptionsProvider`, and that symbol no longer exists 
in the `pylance` 6.0.0 wheel that `lance-namespace==0.7.5` pulls in.
   - **0.3.0** (positive control): PASS — 1000-row Ray dataset round-trips 
through write_lance / read_lance.
   
   I updated `docs/lance-rest-integration.md` in #11119 to replace the 
inaccurate "pip resolves them with an older lance-namespace" line with these 
two concrete failure modes, so future readers know exactly what breaks.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to