[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344251#comment-16344251 ]
Michael Jumper commented on GUACAMOLE-168: ------------------------------------------ {quote} Pardon my ignorant question: isn't a X.Org driver an overkill? {quote} It seems a perfect fit, actually. Considering Guacamole as a display mechanism, it makes sense to have a driver for a network display (Guacamole) just as you would have a driver for a hardware display (graphics card). {quote} Won't a compositing WM provide the same features? {quote} Unless compositing window managers can be nested, no. This would sacrifice the user's ability to use their desktop environment of choice. > Add support for X.Org > --------------------- > > Key: GUACAMOLE-168 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-168 > Project: Guacamole > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: guacamole-client, guacamole-server > Reporter: Michael Jumper > Assignee: Michael Jumper > Priority: Major > > It's been frequently requested that we add support for a more efficient > protocol like NX or X2Go. Though that sounds nice on the surface, and > theoretically would allow us to leverage some of Guacamole's nicer > protocol-level features, investigating deeper reveals: > # X2Go *is* NX - it uses the same protocol behind the scenes. > # NX isn't really a protocol - it is essentially a compressor for X11, and > depends on the client having a local X11 server to handle the decompressed > result. > Implementing support for either of these would thus involve implementing > support for X11, which is crazy. *However:* > What about implementing a driver for the X.Org X11 server? > The X.Org server provides a driver abstraction layer which exposes access to > windows (including their hierarchy) and pixmaps, much in the same way the > Guacamole protocol provides nestable layers and buffers. If we were to > implement a Guacamole driver for X.Org, we would be able to make much greater > use Guacamole protocol features like client-side compositing. Operations > which are typically expensive in VNC or RDP like window movement suddenly > become simple, as they only involve updating the properties of a layer. > I have an experimental implementation of all this, built upon several other > improvements which ended up being required. Work started several years ago, > even before Guacamole was accepted into the Apache Incubator, but I think > it's finally ready to move forward. I've been using it myself for roughly a > month now, and so far so good. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)