[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15931262#comment-15931262
 ] 

Michael Jumper commented on GUACAMOLE-243:
------------------------------------------

{quote}
Mike, I'm not sure what the "proper" way to go about this is - I'm going to 
open a new pull request from my copy of the repo with the combination of Adam's 
code and mine. If there's a different way I should handle this, let me know.
{quote}

Don't just copy the code - we need to preserve commit authorship and history. 
Further ... I really think we should be working with Adam here to get the code, 
etc. to the point that we're good with merging the original PR. It's fine if 
the PR itself is not 100% of what is necessary for this issue.

I know it's tempting to jump in and do things yourself, but encouraging 
community contribution is important as well. Allowing contributors to show 
merit is the only way that people can eventually become committers, after all.

> LDAP auth fails when search results include an LDAP referral
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GUACAMOLE-243
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-243
>             Project: Guacamole
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: guacamole-auth-ldap
>            Reporter: Adam Thorn
>
> The ldap search in 
> extensions/guacamole-auth-ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/guacamole/auth/ldap/user/UserService.java
>  to find the DN of the user who is logging in (i.e. inside getUserDNs() ) 
> fails if the LDAPSearchResults include an LDAP referral, because 
> LDAPSearchResults.next() throws an LDAPReferralException:
> https://www.novell.com/documentation/developer/jldap/jldapenu/api/com/novell/ldap/LDAPSearchResults.html#next()
> This particularly affects Active Directory, where typically the LDAP 
> implementation has separate partitions for DNS zones and Configuration (see 
> e.g. 
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32989159/ldapsearch-entire-active-directory-without-refldap-returns
>  for an example of the three LDAP referrals that AD returns). Empirically, 
> against my AD, even when an ldap search for (sAMAccountName=$USERNAME) 
> correctly returns the dn for the searched-for $USERNAME , I still also get 
> the three ldap referrals mentioned in that stackoverflow post. Thus, even 
> though the first result in the LDAPSearchResults has the correct dn for the 
> user logging in, results.next() then throws an exception when it encounters 
> the referral and the login fails.
> This only happens when ldap-user-base-dn is set to the base dn of my AD (i.e. 
> with dc=example,dc=com I get referrals, but with ou=Users,dc=example,dc=com 
> as the search base I do not). The structure of my AD requires me to set the 
> base dn as the search base, though.
> N.B. A possible workaround is to explicitly query the Global Catalog (by 
> setting ldap-port: 3268). However, that performs a forest-wide search rather 
> than just a domain-wide search, which might not be desired.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to