[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16041087#comment-16041087
 ] 

Michael Jumper commented on GUACAMOLE-102:
------------------------------------------

{quote}
Okay - I wasn't sure, since the original request was "implementation of 
resource-based balancing" - which isn't entirely satisfied. The framework has 
been created for this to happen with the addition of the weight field, but it 
doesn't totally satisfy the request to implement resource-based balancing.
{quote}

How so?

{quote}
Yes, definitely need to make sure security is addressed. With the current API 
is it possible to authenticate individual requests - like passing either 
username/password in a header, or passing a digest or authorization header?
{quote}

Yes, REST resources will inherently require an authenticated Guacamole session 
if they are exposed via {{UserContext.getResource()}}.


> Load balancing based on resource
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GUACAMOLE-102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-102
>             Project: Guacamole
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: guacamole, guacamole-auth-jdbc, 
> guacamole-auth-jdbc-mysql, guacamole-auth-jdbc-postgresql, guacamole-client, 
> RDP
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.10-incubating
>         Environment: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
> Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
>            Reporter: Werner Novak
>            Assignee: Nick Couchman
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Implementation of an resource based (CPU, Memory, I/O, Loggedin User) 
> balancing in opposite to the current implemented guacamole connections round 
> robin. This is needed because of an large RDP infrastructure (300+ TS), where 
> the terminal server been accessed via multiple RDP load balancers during 
> migration.
> A prototype has been developed in a guacamole fork
> https://github.com/wnovak/incubator-guacamole-client.git



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to