[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16646072#comment-16646072
 ] 

Christian Lenz commented on NETBEANS-51:
----------------------------------------

Hm I don't know. In general, everything can changed via patches after a big 
release. That happened often. And for example we had 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 and for 
the last release we had 2 patches. So the question is, what patches includes. 
Define patches. If we define patches only for bug fixing, that ok. If we define 
patches also for new features then this is related to this ticket. Please join 
the mailing list. The most important stuff is going on there, nowhere else. And 
you can decide too, because you are part of the community as me and all the 
others :)

> Major plugin release cycles should be independent from the core
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NETBEANS-51
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-51
>             Project: NetBeans
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Adrien Crivelli
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: planning, release, roadmap, workflow
>
> NetBeans releases versions roughly every year. Unfortunately that means that 
> major plugins, such as the one for PHP support, does not get updated for 12 
> months or more. So when a major PHP version is available (7.1), NetBeans 
> users still have to wait for several months before being able to benefit from 
> new features, despite the fact that the plugin was already updated (5 months 
> ago, and counting).
> Of course we can use dev build in the meantime, but unfortunately those dev 
> builds are far from being stable. I regularly get Java exceptions and 
> everything seems to be slightly slower than a production release. 
> This lead to a lot of frustration for end-users, as can be [seen 
> there|https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268317]. And I believe 
> this is not specific to PHP plugin, but must also happens for pretty much all 
> other language/frameworks that are not Java related.
> The solution seems simple to me. Since NetBeans already is architectured with 
> plugins in mind and those are already auto-updated. We only have to allow 
> plugin author to release their plugins at their own pace.
> In fact this is exactly how it is done for the plugin to add support for 
> TypeScript (https://github.com/Everlaw/nbts). Its release cycle is not tied 
> to NetBeans and it's working great.
> So I am kinda wondering why does PHP need to be tied to NetBeans release ? 
> what are the advantage for end-users and/or developers ?
> [~am...@kthree.co.jp], do you know whether it would be technically possible 
> to release PHP as a independent plugin more often ?
> It seems to be a purely organisational issue. And if it could be fixed with 
> the move to Apache, that would be awesome.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to