Boris Heithecker created NETBEANS-3234:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: Apache NetBeans running on JDK 11 cannot access package 
classes
                 Key: NETBEANS-3234
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3234
             Project: NetBeans
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 11.1
            Reporter: Boris Heithecker


If a package-info element is defined in some package, it cannot be properly 
accessed at runtime:  
 
java.lang.Package p = AnyClass.class.getPackage();
 
should return a package object representing the actual package-info element of 
that package. It is, for example, used by the JAXB runtime to read XmlSchema 
annotations at package level. 
 
This has been tested in oracle jdk11.0.4. Class java.lang.Package in Java 11 
has a private field called "packageInfo" of type "Class<?>", which should hold 
a reference to the actual package-info class object, i.e. 
AnyPackage.package-info. In NetBeans, always wrongly references 
"java.lang.Package$1PackageInfoProxy", which is a fallback reference set if no 
actual package-info could be found. 
 
The reason is most likely that neither 
 
org.netbeans.JarClassLoader
nor org.netbeans.ProxyClassLoader
nor org.netbeans.StandardModule$OneModuleClassLoader (all in 
platform/o.n.bootstrap)
 
override method "java.lang.ClassLoader.findClass(String name)". The default 
implementation throws an exceptions which causes the above fallback reference 
to be set. 
 
This is a serious issue. If it is not fixed, the platform will not be fully 
comptabile, among others, with the JAXB RI and also JAX-WS RI. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to