[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16955295#comment-16955295
 ] 

Pablo Fernández Peña commented on NETBEANS-84:
----------------------------------------------

Hi [~Juneau001], again! :)

Activating the CDI alignment of JSF 2.3 through the *@FacesConfig* annotation 
(_very important_) it activates the CDI-Injection of JSF Owned Types in Java 
code, and the CDI-EL Resolver for that types in Facelets. Regarding these in 
NetBeans it happens:

1) All CDI-EL Resolved types are properly recognized by NetBeans when editing 
the facelets (being cautious that for some types and its qualifier, the names 
are pretty different, e.g. in Java code "@Inject @RequestParameterValuesMap 
Map<String, String[]> requestParameterValuesMap;" is in EL "#\{paramValues}"), 
but not for one; "#\{externalContext}" is not recognized, although not displays 
any error (so it is not critical) it not code assist the user so I think it is 
not recognized:

!image-2019-10-19-18-11-36-478.png|width=999,height=481!

[^newInJSF23.xhtml]

2) Regarding the CDI-Injection of JSF Owned Types in Java code, none of the 
types are recognized as CDI available injection points, it is displayed as a 
warning so it is not critical:

!image-2019-10-19-18-17-10-545.png|width=999,height=480!

[^NewInJSF23.java]

As you see both issues are not critical and also involve CDI, but I think they 
are principally JSF 2.3 related issues that NetBeans must support to be "JSF 
2.3 compliant".

Regards, Pablo.

> Support for JSF 2.3
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: NETBEANS-84
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-84
>             Project: NetBeans
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: javaee - JSF
>    Affects Versions: 8.2, 9.0, Next
>            Reporter: Philip Durbin
>            Assignee: Josh Juneau
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 11.3
>
>         Attachments: NewInJSF23.java, NewInJSF23.java, 
> image-2019-10-19-17-33-34-341.png, image-2019-10-19-17-34-47-683.png, 
> image-2019-10-19-18-11-36-478.png, image-2019-10-19-18-17-10-545.png, 
> netbeans-red-jsf2.3.png, newInJSF23.xhtml, newInJSF23.xhtml
>
>          Time Spent: 768h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> One thing that struck me while attending Ed Burns' JSF talk[1] about JSF 2.3 
> at JavaOne 2017 was a comment he made that autocompletion isn't working in 
> Netbeans for JSF 2.3 features. I would describe this as NetBeans 8.2 showing 
> "angry red" for components it doesn't understand, such as f:validateWholeBean.
> As in the attached screenshot, an example error is "The component library Jsf 
> Core does not contain component validateWholeBean".
> Here's the code from the screenshot: 
> https://github.com/javaee/glassfish-samples/blob/4b3a37500a256bb7d94e2abe273503c9fb017c6b/ws/javaee8/jsf/ee8additions/src/main/webapp/validateWholeBean.xhtml
> In the past, NetBeans releases were coordinated with Java EE releases. When 
> Java EE 8 came out, I expected that NetBeans 9 would come out and support JSF 
> 2.3. When we onboard new developers, I would rather not say to them, "It's ok 
> to see angry red like this in NetBeans."
> Incidentally, during Ed's talk I asked if he knew if JSF 2.3 is supported by 
> IntelliJ or Eclipse and he wasn't aware if they support it or not.
> !netbeans-red-jsf2.3.png|thumbnail!
> !https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12891266/netbeans-red-jsf2.3.png|height=300,width=444!
> [1] Contemporary Java Web Applications with JSF 2.3 - 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yshXLB_HdhU



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to