[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14701322#comment-14701322
 ] 

Mark Payne commented on NIFI-744:
---------------------------------

[~brianghig]: I am in the process of creating a new patch that is built against 
the 'master' branch, as that is what the community has decided to switch to. 
Once I have that patch created, I will upload it here.

I added quite a few unit tests to test all of the corner cases that I could 
come up with, as well as the regular functionality. I've had it running on a 
test cluster for several weeks now without issue. It's really just a matter of 
stressing it out, hitting it from every angle that we can. Since it hasn't been 
officially released yet, I won't recommend pushing it to your production 
environment, but if you want to use the patch to push to a dev/test environment 
to ensure that all behaves as expected, then that would be great.

> Allow FileSystemRepository to write to the same file for multiple 
> (non-parallel) sessions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-744
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-744
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> Currently, when a ProcessSession is committed, the Content Claim that was 
> being written to is now "finished" and will never be written to again.
> When a flow has processors that generate many, many FlowFiles, each in their 
> own session, this means that we have many, many files on disk on the Content 
> Repository, as well. Generally, this hasn't been a problem to write to these 
> files. However, when the files are to be archived or destroyed, this is very 
> taxing and can cause erratic performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to