[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15005929#comment-15005929
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-748:
-------------------------------------

Github user trkurc commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/123#discussion_r44872910
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-provenance-repository-bundle/nifi-persistent-provenance-repository/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance/lucene/DocsReader.java
 ---
    @@ -47,9 +46,6 @@
     public class DocsReader {
         private final Logger logger = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(DocsReader.class);
     
    -    public DocsReader(final List<File> storageDirectories) {
    -    }
    -
    --- End diff --
    
    I'm like 95% with @olegz  on this. I believe it is implausible that someone 
would be calling this method and likely needed a comment that it was public for 
some other reason than it was a public API. That 5% not with @olegz is adding 
deprecation tag adds a tiny smidge of tech debt, which would be swept up when 
we investigate all the deprecated methods for 1.0.0 


> If unable to find a specific Provenance event, should not fail entire search
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-748
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-748
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Oleg Zhurakousky
>             Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>
> We have a case where running with the prov being written to a disk that can 
> be ejected. Disk was accidentally ejected while running. Provenance Event 
> appears to have been indexed but event is not in the repo.
> Specifically, we are reaching Line 104 of DocsReader:
> {code}
> throw new IOException("Failed to find Provenance Event " + d);
> {code}
> As a result, searching for a specific Component ID is returning an error, so 
> we can't search on that Component ID at all (unless we shrink the time range 
> to a time when that didn't occur).
> We should generate a warning, and notify the user that X number of events 
> could not be found and show what we can, rather than erroring out entirely.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to