[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311865#comment-17311865
 ] 

Sean Muir commented on MINIFI-521:
----------------------------------

I am getting this when trying to do a maven install:

 

{{[WARNING] The POM for 
org.apache.nifi.minifi:minifi-commons-schema:jar:0.6.0-SNAPSHOT is missing, no 
dependency information available}}

 

Any idea on how I can get past this?

> minifi-toolkit-0.5.0: "Connection with id ... has invalid destination id" 
> confused by targetId?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFI-521
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-521
>             Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Agent Configuration/Installation
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0
>         Environment: version: '3'
> services:
>   nifi:
>     image: apache/nifi:1:10.0
>   minifi:
>     image: apache/nifi-minifi:0.5.0
> minifi-toolkit-0.5.0, Windows
>            Reporter: Sebastian Napiorkowski
>            Assignee: Aldrin Piri
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>         Attachments: MiNiFi-buggy.xml, MiNiFi-expected.xml, config-buggy.yml, 
> config-expected.yml, config.yml, minifi-flow.xml
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I followed this tutorial: [Getting started with 
> MiNiFi|https://nifi.apache.org/minifi/getting-started.html]
> And the problem was that, while transforming the Template to the yml-file, it 
> failed with: "Connection with id 10de7342-41ef-37a5-0000-000000000000 has 
> invalid destination id 9b02eb45-3c2d-3fb4-91cf-880d5038c0cd"
> {code:java}
> minifi-toolkit-0.5.0\bin\config.bat transform  MiNiFi-buggy.xml 
> config-buggy.yml
> There are validation errors with the template, still outputting YAML but it 
> will need to be edited.
> Connection with id 10de7342-41ef-37a5-0000-000000000000 has invalid 
> destination id 9b02eb45-3c2d-3fb4-91cf-880d5038c0cd
> {code}
> By the help of brosander@github (Thank you, mate!) we discovered that the 
> tool is confused by the targetId property:
> {code:xml}
>                     <contents>
>                         <inputPorts>
>                             <batchSettings/>
>                             <comments></comments>
>                             
> <concurrentlySchedulableTaskCount>1</concurrentlySchedulableTaskCount>
>                             <connected>true</connected>
>                             <exists>true</exists>
>                             
> <groupId>db4d2e20-016e-1000-d3c7-73a67e2b1d67</groupId>
>                             <id>9b02eb45-3c2d-3fb4-91cf-880d5038c0cd</id>
>                             <name>input_minifi</name>
>                             
> <targetId>dadd7f29-016e-1000-3c91-89495c813674</targetId>
>                             <targetRunning>false</targetRunning>
>                             <transmitting>false</transmitting>
>                             <useCompression>false</useCompression>
>                         </inputPorts>
>                     </contents>
> {code}
> just by removing the {{targetId}}, the toolkit runs through:
> {code:java}
> minifi-toolkit-0.5.0\bin\config.bat transform   MiNiFi-expected.xml 
> config-expected.yml
> No validation errors found in converted configuration.
> {code}
> The produced files differ:
> {code:java}
> diff config-buggy.yml config-expected.yml
> 101c101
> <     - id: dadd7f29-016e-1000-3c91-89495c813674
> ---
> >     - id: 9b02eb45-3c2d-3fb4-91cf-880d5038c0cd
> {code}
> -I tested it and NiFi discovers MiNiFi, everything seems fine.-
> EDIT:
> I celebrated to early. Removing the {{targetId}} is *not* a working 
> workaround. The easiest way to get around this issue is to downgrade NiFi 
> from 1.10 to 1.9.2.
> Originally I thought this is a MiNiFi issue, but now I'm thinking that 
> something changed in NiFi from 1.9.2 to 1.10.0 when exporting Templates. The 
> ids are mixed up. This could be a much more critical bug, than I initially 
> thought.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to