nuttxpr commented on PR #2808:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2808#issuecomment-2451593624

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with an Empty 
Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary.
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections 
could be more explicit.
   
   Here's a breakdown and suggestions for improvement:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:**  The summary clearly states the purpose of the change: 
improving the `nxdiag` example for Espressif devices.
   * **Specific Impact:** The impact section identifies the affected devices 
(all ESP32 devices).
   * **Detailed Testing:** The testing section provides specific configuration 
options, expected output, and a log snippet. This demonstrates functionality 
and allows for easy verification.
   
   
   **Areas for Improvement:**
   
   * **Summary (What functional part & How it works):** While stating the *why* 
(improvement), the summary lacks details on *what* part of `nxdiag` is changed 
and *how* the improvement is achieved.  For example,  "The `nxdiag` example is 
improved by adding the ability to display Espressif-specific information such 
as bootloader version, toolchain version, flash ID, and security information."
   * **Impact (More Explicit "NO" answers):**  While mentioning "All ESP32 
devices" implies some impact,  explicitly state "NO" for categories without 
impact.  For example: "Impact on user: NO", "Impact on build: NO (assuming the 
required Espressif tools are already installed)",  "Impact on documentation: 
YES (the documentation should be updated to reflect the new `nxdiag` 
capabilities for Espressif devices)".  This removes ambiguity.
   * **Impact (Security and Compatibility):**  Even if there's no impact, 
briefly justify the "NO".  For example, "Impact on security: NO (This change 
only reads existing information and does not introduce new vulnerabilities)." 
and "Impact on compatibility: NO (This change only adds functionality and does 
not affect existing `nxdiag` features)."
   * **Testing (Before Change Logs):** Include logs from *before* the change to 
demonstrate the improvement.  This shows what was missing and how the PR 
addresses it.
   * **Testing (Build Host):**  Specify the build host details as requested in 
the template.
   * **Testing (Multiple Targets):**  Ideally, test across multiple ESP32 
variants (e.g., ESP32, ESP32-S2, ESP32-C3) to ensure broader compatibility.
   
   
   **Example of an improved Summary and Impact:**
   
   ```
   ## Summary
   
   This change enhances the `nxdiag` example to provide more detailed 
diagnostic information for Espressif devices. It adds support for displaying 
Espressif-specific details, including bootloader version, toolchain 
information, flash and chip IDs, security settings, and MAC address.  This is 
achieved by integrating Espressif's APIs and tools into the `nxdiag` framework. 
 Relates to [NuttX Issue #XXX] (if applicable).
   
   ## Impact
   
   * Is new feature added? YES
   * Is existing feature changed? YES (The `nxdiag` command now outputs 
additional information for Espressif devices)
   * Impact on user: NO (Users can simply run the `nxdiag` command to access 
the new information.)
   * Impact on build: NO (assuming the required Espressif tools are already 
installed)
   * Impact on hardware: YES (This change specifically targets Espressif ESP32 
devices)
   * Impact on documentation: YES (The documentation should be updated to 
describe the new `nxdiag` output for Espressif devices.)
   * Impact on security: NO (This change only reads existing information and 
does not introduce new vulnerabilities).
   * Impact on compatibility: NO (This change only adds functionality and does 
not affect existing `nxdiag` features).
   * Anything else to consider:  N/A
   ```
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will be even stronger and easier for 
reviewers to assess.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to