nuttxpr commented on PR #14602: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14602#issuecomment-2452773878
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, though some clarifications might be helpful. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change, and links to the related issue. * **Impact Description:** The impact section covers most points, highlighting the change in CI behavior for complex PRs and confirming no impact on simple PRs. The impact on the user (contributors) is adequately explained. * **Testing Evidence:** Links to CI runs demonstrating the change are provided, showing before/after behavior (though the "before" is implicit - previous CI runs presumably built arm-01, 09, and 11 for complex PRs). **Potential Improvements (for the actual PR, not this summary):** * **Impact - Build:** While it mentions the build process change, a slightly more detailed explanation in the Impact/Build section might be beneficial. E.g., *"...will now trigger builds for msys2, msvc, arm-08, arm-10, and arm-13 in complex PRs. This changes the matrix of tested architectures and compilers." * * **Impact - Hardware:** Clarify if this change has any impact on the *supported* hardware. This PR focuses on CI, but if it affects which architectures are tested/validated, that indirectly impacts supported hardware. If no change to *supported* hardware, explicitly state that. * **Testing Logs:** While CI run links are provided, including snippets of relevant logs (e.g., showing which architectures were built) directly in the PR description would strengthen the testing evidence. This allows quicker verification without navigating to external links. * **Rationale:** Briefly explain *why* these specific architectures were chosen for complex PRs and why others were removed. This helps reviewers understand the decision-making process and assess its validity. While the provided summary is good, enhancing these points would further solidify its adherence to the requirements and make the PR easier to review and understand. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
