nuttxpr commented on PR #14756: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14756#issuecomment-2472595184
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicit. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *why*, *what*, and *how* of the change. The rationale for removing redundant calls is well-stated. * **Impact is Addressed:** The impact section highlights the positive effect of the change and correctly identifies areas with no impact. * **Testing Provided:** The testing scenario demonstrates the problem and the solution. The use of a multi-level directory structure is a good approach. **Areas for Improvement (While seemingly compliant, these additions would strengthen the PR):** * **Explicitly state what changes:** While implied, directly stating "This PR removes redundant calls to `nuttx_generate_kconfig()`" in the summary would improve clarity. * **Quantify the impact:** "Correctly handles" is a bit vague. If possible, quantify the improvement. For example: "This eliminates N redundant calls to `nuttx_generate_kconfig()` in a typical build where N is the number of subdirectories with Kconfigs" or similar. This helps reviewers understand the scale of the improvement. * **Before/After Logs:** While you describe the test setup, actual *output* from `menuconfig` before and after the change would strengthen the testing section considerably. Showing the redundant menu entries before and their absence after is crucial empirical evidence. Even a simplified snippet of the menu output would be valuable. * **Target Details:** Be more specific about the target. "arch(sim,RISC-V,ARM,..), board:config" is too broad. Specify the *exact* target used (e.g., "qemu-nrf52832-dk configured with mcuboot_app"). * **Build Host Details:** Similarly, be more explicit about the build host OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version used. (e.g., "Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, GCC 11.3.0"). By adding these details, the PR would become even stronger and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
