nuttxpr commented on PR #14815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14815#issuecomment-2480495464

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although it could be 
more thorough.  While concise, it lacks some specifics.
   
   Here's a breakdown of what's good and what could be improved:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *why*, *what*, and *how* of 
the change. The benefit (flash saving) is also mentioned.
   * **Impact Acknowledged:** The impact on flash size is noted.
   * **Testing Performed:**  A target platform is mentioned.
   
   
   **Weaknesses:**
   
   * **Missing Issue References:**  No related issue is referenced. Even if 
there isn't one, stating "N/A" would be helpful.
   * **Impact Under-specified:** While flash size is mentioned, the other 
impact categories are not explicitly addressed (even with "NO").  Explicitly 
stating "NO" for most categories helps reviewers quickly assess the scope of 
the change.
   * **Testing Insufficiently Detailed:**  While a target is mentioned, there 
are no build host details, compiler information, or actual test logs. 
"nucleo-f302r8" is not enough information; the specific configuration should be 
mentioned (e.g., `nsh`).  The provided log sections are empty.  Without logs 
demonstrating the before/after difference in flash usage, the claim of 220B 
savings isn't verifiable.
   
   
   **Recommendation:**  The PR author should add the following:
   
   * **Link to a related issue or state "N/A".**
   * **Explicitly address *all* impact categories, even if the answer is "NO".**
   * **Provide detailed build host information (OS, CPU, compiler version).**
   * **Specify the exact NuttX configuration used for testing (e.g., `nsh`).**
   * **Include *actual* before/after test logs (e.g., `size` output) 
demonstrating the flash usage difference.**
   
   
   By adding these details, the PR will be much stronger and easier for 
reviewers to evaluate.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to