nuttxpr commented on PR #14817: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14817#issuecomment-2480603749
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a reason for the change (removing the `up_` prefix), it lacks critical information. Here's what's missing: * **Specificity in Summary:** "Common driver" is vague. Which driver? What is the full path to the affected code? Why *shouldn't* it have the `up_` prefix? (Is it not platform-specific? Is there a naming convention violation?) Be explicit. * **Impact Detail:** While "code refactor only" is a start, it needs more detail. Does this refactor affect any APIs? Does it change any functionality beyond the name? Even if the answer is no, explicitly stating "NO" for all impact categories with brief justifications (e.g., "Impact on user: NO - This is a purely internal code change.") is necessary. * **Testing Detail:** "ci" is insufficient. Which CI systems? What specific tests were run? Provide links to successful CI runs if possible. Ideally, provide snippets of relevant logs demonstrating the change's effect (even if it's just a name change). What target hardware or simulator was tested? The PR needs to be much more detailed to be acceptable. Even seemingly minor changes require thorough documentation to ensure maintainability and avoid regressions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
