nuttxpr commented on PR #14821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14821#issuecomment-2480613716

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   This PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but is missing some 
crucial details.  Here's a breakdown:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Summary:** Provides a decent overview of the changes made.  Listing 
multiple distinct changes like this is helpful.
   * **Impact:** While "minor" is concise, it lacks specificity.  The impact 
section needs to address *all* the listed impact points (user, build, hardware, 
documentation, security, compatibility).  While the impact *might* be "no" for 
most of these, it needs to be explicitly stated.
   
   **Weaknesses:**
   
   * **Summary:** Missing issue references if any of these changes relate to 
reported issues.  While not strictly required if no issue exists, it's good 
practice to create one for non-trivial changes.
   * **Impact:**  Severely lacking detail.  Even if the answer is "NO" for each 
item, it needs to be explicitly stated (e.g., "Impact on user: NO").  This PR 
touches scheduling, sensors, and the simulator; at least *some* of the impact 
categories are likely affected. For example, replacing `nuttx_mode_t` with 
`int` *could* have compatibility implications.  These need to be explained.
   * **Testing:** "ci" is insufficient.  While CI testing is important, the 
requirements explicitly state "verified on local setup."  The PR needs to 
specify the host and target details, as well as provide *actual* log snippets 
demonstrating the fix.  Just saying "ci" doesn't prove the change works as 
intended.
   
   **Recommendation:**
   
   The PR author needs to expand on the Impact and Testing sections 
significantly.  They need to explicitly address each point in the Impact 
section, even if the answer is "NO." The Testing section needs real host/target 
details and log output demonstrating the before/after behavior.  The Summary 
section could also benefit from linked issue references if any exist.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to