nuttxpr commented on PR #14823: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14823#issuecomment-2480636602
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary and mentions testing via CI, several crucial pieces of information are missing. Here's a breakdown of what's lacking: * **Insufficient Summary Detail:** The summary provides basic usage but doesn't explain *why* this new tool is necessary. What problem does it solve? What existing functionality does it improve upon (or replace)? How does it work internally? Are there related NuttX issues? * **Missing Impact Assessment:** Simply stating "new host tool" is insufficient. Consider the impact points listed in the requirements: * **Feature:** *Is* it a new feature? Or does it replace/modify an existing one? * **User Impact:** How will users interact with this tool? Will existing workflows change? * **Build Impact:** Does adding this tool require changes to the NuttX build system? Does it introduce new dependencies? * **Hardware Impact:** Does this tool interact with hardware in any specific way? Is it architecture-specific? * **Documentation:** This new tool requires documentation explaining its purpose, usage, and options. * **Security/Compatibility:** These points haven't been addressed. Even if the impact is "NO," it should be explicitly stated. * **Inadequate Testing Information:** "ci" is not enough. While CI testing is important, the PR needs to show *specific* test results. * **Build Host Details:** Specify the OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version used for testing. * **Target Details:** Which architecture(s) and board configurations was this tested on? Was it tested on real hardware or a simulator? * **Logs:** The PR needs to include "before" and "after" logs demonstrating the tool's functionality and the problem it solves (or the improvement it delivers). Simply saying "ci" provides no evidence that the tool actually works. In short, the PR needs to be significantly more detailed to meet the NuttX requirements. It needs to provide a thorough explanation of the changes, their impact, and clear evidence of testing. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
