nuttxpr commented on PR #14937: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14937#issuecomment-2498542421
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does *not* fully meet the NuttX requirements based on the information provided. While it attempts to address some sections, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: **Summary:** * **Insufficient Detail:** "Update documentation to use correct script" is too vague. Which documentation? What was the incorrect script? Why was it incorrect? What's the correct script's purpose? Be specific! Example: "The documentation for debugging with GDB incorrectly referenced `gdbinit.sh`. This PR updates the documentation to correctly reference the Python-based initialization script, `tools/gdb/gdbinit.py`, which provides enhanced debugging features like..." **Impact:** * **Too Brief:** While "No" answers the questions, it doesn't inspire confidence. Briefly explain *why* there's no impact. For example: "No impact on users, build, hardware, security, or compatibility. This is a documentation-only change." Even for "no impact" items, a brief justification strengthens the PR. If the documentation fix corrects an error that prevented users from debugging, that *is* a user impact (positive, but still an impact). **Testing:** * **Missing Critical Information:** "Documentation locally build pass" is inadequate. * **Build Host:** Specify your OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version. Example: "Linux, x86_64, GCC 12.1" * **Target:** If the documentation refers to a specific target, mention it. Even if it's generic documentation, state that. Example: "N/A - Documentation change only" or "Tested on: sim:qemu-x86_64" * **No Logs:** There's no need for extensive logs for a documentation change, but showing the *relevant* parts of the documentation before and after the change would be beneficial. This could be a snippet of the rendered documentation or the source markdown. **In short, the PR needs more context and specifics to be considered complete.** Reviewers need enough information to understand the change, its rationale, and how it was validated. The current description doesn't provide that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
