nuttxpr commented on PR #14953: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14953#issuecomment-2500491523
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the basic NuttX requirements, but could be improved with more detail. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Summary:** Provides a decent overview of the changes, touching upon the "what" and "why." * **Impact:** Identifies key impacts (configuration changes, bug fixes). * **Testing:** Confirms testing was done on Intel hardware. **Weaknesses & Areas for Improvement:** * **Summary:** Lacks sufficient detail on *how* the changes work. More explanation is needed for each bullet point, particularly the fixes. What was the exact nature of the crash? How was the TX ring reset implemented? What was the limitation applied to prevent transmissions after carrier off? Linking to a related NuttX issue would greatly strengthen this section. * **Impact:** Needs more specific YES/NO answers to the listed questions. For example: * **Impact on user:** YES (Users can now configure RX/TX descriptors via Kconfig) * **Impact on build:** Potentially YES (If Kconfig options are added, users might need to reconfigure). Explain what configurations are impacted. * **Impact on hardware:** YES (Specifically affects Intel network drivers - e1000 and igc). * **Impact on documentation:** Potentially YES (If Kconfig options are added, documentation should be updated). Explicitly state if documentation updates were included. * **Impact on security:** NO (or YES if applicable – explain why). * **Impact on compatibility:** Potentially YES (if changing descriptor counts could affect existing users). * **Testing:** Severely lacking detail. * **Build Host(s):** Be specific. "Linux" is insufficient. Provide distro, version, kernel version, compiler version (e.g., "Ubuntu 22.04, Linux 5.15, GCC 11.2.0"). * **Target(s):** Which Intel hardware? Be precise (e.g., "Intel i210, using the `xyz` board configuration"). * **Logs:** Absolutely essential to include *before* and *after* logs demonstrating the fixes. Showing the crash before and its absence after, the TX ring behavior, etc., is crucial for reviewers. Without these, the PR is difficult to evaluate properly. **In short:** The PR provides a starting point, but needs significant expansion, particularly in the Impact and Testing sections, to meet the NuttX standards fully. Providing clear, specific information is key to a successful review process. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
