nuttxpr commented on PR #15078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15078#issuecomment-2523863059

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with an Empty 
Commit Message. Please fill in the Commit Message with the PR Summary.
   
   
   
   No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.  While 
it provides a basic summary and mentions affected architectures, it lacks 
crucial details.  Here's a breakdown of what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**
       * Needs to explain *why* these wrapper functions are necessary.  What 
problem do they solve? What benefit do they provide?
       * What part of the NuttX codebase is being modified?  (e.g., Networking 
subsystem, specific driver, etc.)
       * *How* do the wrappers work? What functionality do they wrap?
   
   * **Impact:**  Simply listing ESP32 variants isn't sufficient.  For each 
"Impact" question, a YES/NO answer is required, followed by a description if 
the answer is YES. For example:
       * **Is new feature added?**  YES (Provides wrapper functions for ESP32 
networking allowing...)
       * **Impact on user:** YES (Users can now utilize... or No changes to 
user experience)
       * **Impact on build:**  Potentially YES if any build system changes are 
needed.  Explain if so.
       * **Impact on hardware:** YES (Affects ESP32 family devices). Be 
specific about what changes.
       * **Impact on documentation:** YES (Documentation should be updated to 
reflect the new functionality and usage of the wrapper functions) or NO if no 
documentation changes needed.
       * **Impact on security:**  Address any potential security implications 
introduced by the wrappers.
       * **Impact on compatibility:**  Discuss any backward or forward 
compatibility issues.
   
   * **Testing:**
       * **Insufficient build host information:** Provide details about the OS, 
CPU architecture, and compiler used for the build host.
       * **Insufficient target information:** Specify the configurations used 
for each ESP32 variant (e.g., `esp32c6-devkitc:nsh`).
       * **Missing logs:**  The PR description claims logs are included, but 
they are absent.  Provide *actual* logs demonstrating the functionality before 
and after the change.  Highlight the specific improvements or fixes.  "NXDIAG 
tests options enabled" isn't sufficient; show the output.
   
   
   In short, the PR description needs to be significantly more detailed to meet 
the NuttX requirements.  It should clearly explain the rationale behind the 
change, its implementation details, and its impact on various aspects of the 
system, supported by concrete testing results.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to