nuttxpr commented on PR #15202: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15202#issuecomment-2544569404
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it links a related PR, it lacks crucial information. Here's what's missing: * **Summary:** Needs a clear explanation of *why* the comment needed fixing. What was wrong with the original comment? What does the corrected comment say? This should be more descriptive than just "fix comment." * **Impact:** The impact section is essentially meaningless. "filep->f_refs" doesn't explain *anything*. All the "Impact on..." questions need to be explicitly answered with "YES" or "NO" and a description provided if "YES." Since this is a comment fix, most should be "NO," but it's important to state that explicitly. * **Testing:** "ci" is insufficient. While CI testing is important, the requirements specifically ask for *local* testing verification. What was the test? What were the results *before* and *after* the change, even if they appear identical? Showing the output, even if unchanged, demonstrates that the change didn't introduce unexpected side effects. In short, while the PR identifies *what* changed, it fails to explain *why* it changed, *how* it impacts the system (even if minimally), and provides insufficient evidence of testing. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
