nuttxpr commented on PR #15221: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15221#issuecomment-2547429950
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details in several sections. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** While it states the change, it doesn't explain *why* replacing the big lock with a small lock is necessary. What problem does it solve? What are the benefits (e.g., performance improvement, reduced resource usage)? It also lacks mentions of related issues. * **Impact:** This section is far too brief. It simply repeats the affected module. It needs to address *all* the listed impact points (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) with specific YES/NO answers and descriptions where necessary. Even if the answer is NO, explicitly state it. For example: "Impact on user: NO". * **Testing:** "ci" is insufficient. It needs to list the *specific* build hosts and targets used for testing. Critically, it's missing the actual *testing logs* before and after the change. Without these logs, there's no way to verify the change works as intended. **Example of how to improve the PR description:** ## Summary This change replaces the big lock in `esp32s3_rtc.c` with a small lock to improve performance and reduce overhead. The big lock caused unnecessary contention in multi-threaded scenarios, leading to performance degradation. This change aims to alleviate this issue by using a more fine-grained locking mechanism. Related NuttX Issue: (If applicable - add link) Related NuttX Apps Issue/PR: (If applicable - add link) ## Impact * Impact on user: NO * Impact on build: NO * Impact on hardware: YES - Affects esp32s3 architecture. * Impact on documentation: NO * Impact on security: NO * Impact on compatibility: NO * Anything else to consider: This change might slightly increase code size due to the additional small lock implementation. ## Testing I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: * Build Host(s): Linux (Ubuntu 22.04), x86_64, GCC 11.3.0 * Target(s): esp32s3:sim Testing logs before change: ``` <Insert actual logs demonstrating the issue with the big lock, e.g., timing measurements, evidence of contention> ``` Testing logs after change: ``` <Insert actual logs demonstrating the improvement after applying the small lock, e.g., improved timing measurements, reduced contention> ``` By providing this level of detail, reviewers can understand the context of the change, assess its impact, and verify its effectiveness through the provided test logs. This makes the review process significantly smoother and increases the chances of the PR being accepted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
