nuttxpr commented on PR #15225: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15225#issuecomment-2547530520
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details. Here's what's missing: * **Summary:** Lacks sufficient detail. *Why* is a smaller lock needed? What performance improvements or other benefits does it bring? What part of `esp32c3_rtc.c` is changed (specific functions)? *How* does the smaller lock mechanism work compared to the previous one? Are there any related NuttX issues? * **Impact:** Simply stating "esp32c3_rtc" isn't enough. Answer all the specific impact questions (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility). For example, will the change impact the size of the RTC driver? Will it affect power consumption? * **Testing:** "ci" is insufficient. Provide actual test logs *before* and *after* the change to demonstrate the improvement or fix. Specify the *exact* build host and target details (OS versions, compiler versions, board configuration). What tests were run? What were the results? Quantify the improvements if any (e.g., "reduced lock contention by X%", "decreased interrupt latency by Y milliseconds"). The PR needs to be significantly more descriptive and provide evidence of testing to meet the NuttX requirements. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
