nuttxpr commented on PR #15229: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15229#issuecomment-2547620208
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described. While it provides a summary of the change itself, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown: * **Insufficient Summary:** While the "what" is stated (changing a spinlock name), the "why" and "how" are missing. *Why* was this name change necessary? Was it for clarity, to avoid conflicts, or another reason? *How* does this change work in the broader context of the code? * **Missing Impact Assessment:** Simply stating "none" is insufficient. While the change *might* have no user-facing impact, the PR needs to explicitly address *all* the impact points. For example, even a minor change like this could have implications for: * **Compatibility:** Does this change break any existing code that relied on the old name? * **Documentation:** Does any documentation need to be updated to reflect the new name? * **Security:** While unlikely in this specific case, considering security implications is always crucial. Perhaps the old name led to confusion, and the new name clarifies ownership and access, thereby improving security. * **Inadequate Testing:** "ci" is not enough. The PR needs to specify: * **Build Host Details:** OS, compiler version, etc. * **Target Details:** Architecture, board, configuration. * **Testing Logs:** Actual logs demonstrating the functionality before and after the change are required, not just a mention of CI. What tests were run? What were the results? Even a simple "before: RTC initialized successfully" and "after: RTC initialized successfully" would be better than nothing. This proves the change didn't break anything. **In short:** The PR needs to be more thorough in explaining the rationale, potential impact, and testing performed. More detail is crucial for reviewers to properly assess the change and ensure code quality. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
