nuttxpr commented on PR #15590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15590#issuecomment-2597909605

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR summary does not meet the NuttX requirements.  It lacks critical 
details.  Here's why and how to fix it:
   
   **Missing Information in Summary:**
   
   * **Insufficient Explanation of the "Why":** "No reason to keep asking for 
these over and over" isn't an explanation of the underlying problem.  What is 
being asked repeatedly? Why is it unnecessary? What benefit does removing it 
bring? (e.g., reduces code size, improves performance, simplifies logic, etc.)
   * **Unclear Functional Change:** "MPFS bootloader only" is too vague.  Which 
*part* of the MPFS bootloader is changed?  Be specific (e.g., "The network 
initialization sequence of the MPFS bootloader...", "The CPU boot counter logic 
in the MPFS bootloader...", etc.)
   * **Missing "How":** How does the change fix the `g_cpus_booted` issue? What 
was the bug, and what's the corrected behavior?  How does the change optimize 
performance?  Explain the mechanism (e.g., "Removed redundant checks in the 
boot sequence," "Optimized a loop in the network initialization," etc.).
   * **Missing Issue References:** If this relates to any reported issues, link 
them.
   
   
   **Missing Information in Impact:**
   
   * **Specifics on Impact:** "performance optimization" and "fix issue with 
g_cpus_booted global variable" are too general. Quantify the performance 
improvement if possible (e.g., "Reduces boot time by X milliseconds," "Reduces 
code size by Y bytes," etc.).  Explain the consequences of the `g_cpus_booted` 
bug and how the fix resolves them.
   * **YES/NO Answers:**  Use the provided "NO/YES" format for each impact 
category and elaborate where needed. For example, since this affects 
performance, the impact on the user is potentially YES.  Explain if this is a 
noticeable improvement or only measurable in specific scenarios.
   
   
   **Missing Information in Testing:**
   
   * **Insufficient Detail:** "MPFS" is not enough.  Specify the build host 
(OS, CPU architecture, compiler), the target platform (architecture, board, 
configuration), and the exact steps to reproduce the tests.
   * **Missing Logs:**  Include actual log output before and after the change 
to demonstrate the fix and performance improvement.  Even if the logs are 
short, they provide valuable evidence.
   
   
   
   **Example of an Improved Summary:**
   
   ```
   This PR optimizes the MPFS bootloader's network initialization sequence by 
removing redundant queries for the MAC address, which were previously performed 
on each CPU boot. This reduces boot time, especially in multi-core systems.  It 
also fixes a bug where the `g_cpus_booted` global variable was not incremented 
correctly when SBI is enabled, leading to inaccurate CPU count reporting. This 
fixes [NuttX Issue #XXX] (if applicable).
   ```
   
   By providing more context and specific details, you make it easier for 
reviewers to understand and evaluate your changes, leading to a smoother and 
faster review process.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to