nuttxpr commented on PR #15597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15597#issuecomment-2599565564

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   This PR mostly meets the NuttX requirements, but could be improved by 
providing more specific details.  Here's a breakdown:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear summary of changes:**  The summary explains the "why," "what," and 
"how" of the changes.  Referencing the prior PR is also helpful.
   * **Acknowledges impact areas:** The impact section touches on several key 
aspects, like functionality, documentation, and networking changes.
   * **Provides basic testing information:**  The testing section indicates the 
host and target environments.
   
   **Weaknesses & Suggestions for Improvement:**
   
   * **Missing Issue References:**  While the prior PR is mentioned, specific 
NuttX or NuttX Apps issues should be linked if applicable.  Even if there isn't 
a directly related issue, creating one for tracking the feature request/bug fix 
is recommended.
   * **Impact Section Lacks Detail:** The impact section is too brief.  Instead 
of just stating "Enhanced NET related changes," describe *specifically* how the 
multi-segment IOV sending impacts users, builds, etc.  For example:
       * **Impact on user:** Users can now potentially see performance 
improvements in network file system operations.
       * **Impact on build:** No changes to the build process itself, but new 
code is added.
       * **Impact on hardware:**  No direct hardware impact, but affects 
network driver usage.
       * **Impact on security:** Consider potential security implications of 
socket-based V9FS (e.g., authentication, data integrity).  Even if there are 
none, explicitly state this.
       * **Impact on compatibility:**  Does this change break anything?  Is it 
compatible with all existing network configurations?
   
   * **Missing "Before/After" Testing Logs:**  The testing section states tests 
passed, but provides no actual logs.  Include relevant log snippets 
demonstrating the change's effect (e.g., mounting the V9FS filesystem, 
performing file operations, demonstrating the multi-segment IOV sending).  Show 
how the behavior differs before and after your changes.
   * **Limited Testing Information:** While QEMU is a good start, testing on 
actual hardware is highly recommended if possible.  Specify the QEMU 
configuration used (e.g., `qemu-system-x86_64 -M virt`). More testing details 
like the specific tests run (if any automated test suite was used) would 
strengthen the PR.
   
   
   **In short:**  The PR is on the right track, but needs more detail, 
particularly in the Impact and Testing sections, to fully meet the NuttX 
requirements.  Be as explicit and thorough as possible to ensure reviewers can 
properly assess the changes.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to