nuttxpr commented on PR #15804: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15804#issuecomment-2648642485
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but some information is missing or could be improved. **Strengths:** * The summary clearly explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change. The mention of code reduction is helpful. * The impact section identifies key changes and potential user impact due to KConfig prefix modifications. The impact on code size is also noted. * The testing section confirms basic functionality. **Weaknesses and Missing Information:** * **Missing Issue References:** The summary should link to related NuttX or NuttX Apps issues if any exist. * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** Several impact fields are not addressed: * **Build:** While Kconfig changes are mentioned, it's unclear if the build *process* itself changes (e.g., new dependencies, build steps). * **Hardware:** While ESP32 and ESP32S3 are mentioned, specifying the exact chips and boards tested is crucial. Just saying "ESP32" is not sufficient. Mention specific development boards. * **Documentation:** Does this change require documentation updates? If so, were they provided in this PR or a separate one? * **Security:** Even if there's no security impact, explicitly stating "NO" is important. * **Compatibility:** Address backward and forward compatibility. Will existing applications still work? * **Insufficient Testing Details:** * **Build Host(s):** Provide details about the development environment used (OS, CPU architecture, compiler version). * **Target(s):** Be much more specific. E.g., instead of "arch(sim,RISC-V,ARM..)," specify "Xtensa LX6 (ESP32), Xtensa LX7 (ESP32S3)." List the exact boards and configurations used for testing. * **Testing Logs:** The placeholder logs need to be replaced with actual logs demonstrating the functionality before and after the change. Show that WiFi works as expected. Quantify the code size reduction. **Recommendation:** Before merging, the PR should be updated to address the missing information and provide more specific details about testing and impact. This will ensure the PR meets the NuttX standards and helps reviewers thoroughly assess the changes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
