nuttxpr commented on PR #15832: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15832#issuecomment-2656234733
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR appears to **mostly** meet the NuttX requirements, but is missing some key information. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary provides a concise explanation of the change and its purpose. * **Impact Addresses Key Areas:** The impact section touches upon relevant areas, specifically highlighting the functional change. * **Testing Mentions Expected Behavior:** Indicates that testing was performed and the expected outcome was observed. **Weaknesses:** * **Missing Details in Summary:** While the summary explains *what* changed, it lacks details on *how* it works. What code was modified? How was the `CAN_TERM` pin configured? * **Insufficient Testing Information:** The testing section is far too vague. It needs to specify: * **Host System:** What OS, compiler, etc. was used for building? * **Target System:** Which specific architecture and board configuration was tested? * **Actual Logs:** "Works as expected" is not sufficient. Provide actual logs demonstrating CAN functionality before and after the change. This could include output from `candump` or similar tools. * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** While the impact on the user is mentioned, several other areas are left blank. At a minimum, consider: * **Impact on Hardware:** This is directly relevant since a pin is being configured. Specify the affected board and any potential implications. * **Impact on Documentation:** Does this change require documentation updates? If not, explicitly state so. **Recommendation:** The PR needs more detail to fully meet the NuttX requirements. Specifically, the author should: 1. **Expand the Summary:** Describe the code changes and the mechanism used to configure the `CAN_TERM` pin. 2. **Provide Detailed Testing Information:** Include host and target system specifications, and provide actual logs showing CAN communication before and after the change. 3. **Complete the Impact Assessment:** Address all impact areas, even if the answer is "NO". Justify any "NO" answers with a brief explanation (e.g., "Impact on Build: NO - No changes to the build system were required"). By addressing these points, the PR will be significantly improved and more likely to be accepted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
