nuttxpr commented on PR #16144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16144#issuecomment-2781642330

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the basic requirements, but it lacks crucial 
details. While it adheres to the structure, the content is too brief to be 
truly informative.  Here's why it's insufficient and what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  Saying "Add release notes for 12.9.0 release" is not 
descriptive enough.  What are the key highlights of this release?  Mention 
significant bug fixes, new features, or improvements.  Even a concise bullet 
list would be better.
   * **Impact:**  Just saying "RELEASE" doesn't convey the full impact.  While 
a release inherently implies changes, the PR needs to specify *what* changed.  
Are there breaking changes?  New dependencies? Deprecations?
   * **Testing:** "CI" is insufficient. While CI passing is important, the PR 
needs to show *specific* tests relevant to the changes introduced by the 
release notes.  If the release notes mention a new feature, show tests 
verifying that feature.  If they mention a bug fix, show tests demonstrating 
the fix.  "Before" and "after" logs are expected, especially for a release.  
What was the behavior before the changes reflected in the release notes, and 
how has it changed?
   
   In short, the PR needs more context. It needs to explain *what* is being 
released, *how* it affects users, and provide *evidence* that the release notes 
accurately reflect the changes.  Just stating that release notes are added 
doesn't fulfill the requirement of demonstrating that the changes described are 
valid and tested.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to