nuttxpr commented on PR #3059: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3059#issuecomment-2806956844
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicit. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change, and links it to a prior NuttX PR. * **Impact on User:** Clearly explains the user impact (inability to change bitrate without the fix). * **Testing:** Provides a reasonable test setup and logs demonstrating the issue before and after the fix. The additional fix for interface names is also mentioned. **Areas for Improvement:** * **Summary:** While the related NuttX PR is linked, a related issue (if one exists) should also be linked. If not, state that there isn't a related issue. * **Impact:** While the user impact is clear, other impact sections are marked "NO" without explanation. Even if there's no impact, explicitly stating "NO - No change to the build process" is better for clarity. Be very explicit. * **Impact - Compatibility:** The summary mentions a backward compatibility issue with a prior NuttX change. This should be explicitly called out in the "Impact on compatibility" section. Is this change backward compatible with *previous* versions of slcan? * **Testing:** While the test setup is described, the host environment isn't fully specified (OS, compiler, etc.). While `can_6_14` is mentioned as a CAN interface on a custom board, more information on the board and the *target* architecture would be helpful. For instance: "Target: ARM, custom board (STM32F4xx based) with a CAN controller". Also specify the NuttX version being tested against. **Example of Improved Impact Section:** ``` ## Impact * Is new feature added? NO * Is existing feature changed? YES, the bitrate setting logic is modified to accommodate a recent change in the NuttX CAN driver. * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO. Users who were previously using the bitrate setting feature of slcan will find it working correctly again. * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO - No changes to the build process. * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? NO - No changes to hardware or drivers. This change affects the slcan application's interaction with the CAN driver. * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO - No documentation updates required. * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO - No security implications. * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? YES - This change restores compatibility with a recent change in NuttX (https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16199) that broke the bitrate setting functionality in slcan. This change is backward compatible with previous versions of slcan that were working correctly before the NuttX change. * Anything else to consider? The maximum length of the CAN interface name supported by slcan has been increased (addressed in a separate commit). ``` By being more thorough and explicit in the Impact and Testing sections, the PR will be easier to review and merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
