realprocrastinator commented on PR #16942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16942#issuecomment-3241016024

   > > @wangchdo could you review #16943? both path want to fix the similar 
problem.
   > 
   > Yes.. But i think it would be better to put the new API as the external 
api as i did
   
   From my perspective, the original design keeps the wait object as an 
internal implementation detail, hidden from the standard user API. Besides, the 
majority of users will not need this level of control, and a simpler interface 
is preferable for them and the issue that we are facing is highly specialized. 
   Anyway, I‘m happy to discuss :-).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to