tinnedkarma commented on PR #16999: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16999#issuecomment-3289546030
> > I am not up to date regarding the mentioned work. Last I checked, there was a thesis published at CTU which I read, something about OpenAlliance MAC-PHY , but there was no mdio involved, phy used spi, but correct me if I am wrong. > > @tinnedkarma I read a little bit about that Clause 45 and maybe these documents could help: https://www.ieee802.org/3/efm/public/nov02/oam/pannell_oam_1_1102.pdf TN1305 Technical note from ST https://pebblebay.com/rtos-clause-45-phy-support/ features supported by QNX and VxWorks. @acassis, thank you for the links, I'll have a look over them shortly. Though, I was referring to the fact that I am not aware of what others are working on NuttX, or what plans are there for NuttX. > I think we can add this initial driver to support the common/old Clause 22 and later improve it to support Clause 45. What do you think @ppisa ? I would wait a bit. Let other add their ideas, we'll get to common ground, I'll update the documentation with the outcome and the code where it needs to, then we'll see if it makes sense to merge it as is, only c22, or to continue work with c45 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
