tinnedkarma commented on PR #16999: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16999#issuecomment-3299041080
> > So the last thing to clarify then is how we handle both c22 and c45 clauses. @matiamic I understand that you can agree on the kconfig approach? @xiaoxiang781216 @acassis Maybe you can have an last word? > > I think adding an option in Kconfig is fine (although I prefer when we remove items from Kconfig than when we add items there, since NuttX has too many entries) I agree, there a some Kconfig files that a thousands of lines long. But I see it as the better option here. I'll update the docs, and the source files with the function signatures. The votes will reset though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
