casaroli commented on PR #7175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/7175#issuecomment-3574887425

   Sorry for bumping this after 3 years.
   
   > and watch any bad feedback
   
   We finally have some bad feedback 😅 .
   
   It looks like 
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/pull/4718 wants to use 
these functions.
   
   The problem can be seen 
[here](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/actions/runs/19575759345/job/56060485385?pr=4718):
   ```
   LD: nuttx
   arm-none-eabi-ld: warning: group_join.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section 
implies executable stack
   arm-none-eabi-ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in 
a future version of the linker
   arm-none-eabi-ld: 
/__w/wasm-micro-runtime/wasm-micro-runtime/nuttx/staging/libapps.a(aot_reloc_thumb.c.__w.wasm-micro-runtime.wasm-micro-runtime.apps.interpreters.wamr_1.o):(.data.target_sym_map+0x3f4):
 undefined reference to `__aeabi_memclr'
   arm-none-eabi-ld: 
/__w/wasm-micro-runtime/wasm-micro-runtime/nuttx/staging/libapps.a(aot_reloc_thumb.c.__w.wasm-micro-runtime.wasm-micro-runtime.apps.interpreters.wamr_1.o):(.data.target_sym_map+0x3fc):
 undefined reference to `__aeabi_memcpy'
   arm-none-eabi-ld: 
/__w/wasm-micro-runtime/wasm-micro-runtime/nuttx/staging/libapps.a(aot_reloc_thumb.c.__w.wasm-micro-runtime.wasm-micro-runtime.apps.interpreters.wamr_1.o):(.data.target_sym_map+0x404):
 undefined reference to `__aeabi_memmove'
   arm-none-eabi-ld: 
/__w/wasm-micro-runtime/wasm-micro-runtime/nuttx/staging/libapps.a(aot_reloc_thumb.c.__w.wasm-micro-runtime.wasm-micro-runtime.apps.interpreters.wamr_1.o):(.data.target_sym_map+0x40c):
 undefined reference to `__aeabi_memset'
   ```
   
   Should we try to revert this PR?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to