parthitce commented on PR #18391: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18391#issuecomment-3901806737
> Also I won't block the PR about this since I have pretty much no familiarity with the tricore architecture, but is it necessary to use the SDK? It seems like this PR needs to include a lot of workarounds for quirks with the SDK (like the libc stubs and patch files). Is it at all possible to avoid using the SDK directly? I know a few other archs in NuttX use this approach (hence why I don't think it's a dealbreaker or anything), but I also know the preferred method is to avoid using vendor SDKs/HALs entirely if possible. On this note, we are already in the phase of developing iLLD independent Tricore support. Although this isn't mature yet, plans are tracked here [1]. Also you can find development tree with various branches [2] named `dev/infineon/tricore-xxyy`, for example working variant of UART [3]. Our main goal is get to upstream NuttX during the course of this year. [1]: https://github.com/orgs/linumiz/projects/11 [2]: https://github.com/linumiz/nuttx [3]: https://github.com/linumiz/nuttx/tree/dev/infineon/tricore-uart -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
