Laczen commented on PR #19831: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/19831#issuecomment-5291353688
It might be possible to avoid any additional Kconfig: depending on the meaning of "CONFIG_FLASH_START". If this is considered to be the nuttx FLASH_START it should not care if there is a image header or not. It would be the responsability of the user to take into account a header that is added to the image. This would be logic, but it might be contradictory to the definition of `board_boot_image()` which takes a header size as argument. @xiaoxiang781216, @raiden00pl what do you think is the correct interpretation of CONFIG_FLASH_START? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
