Laczen commented on PR #20014: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/20014#issuecomment-5481021369
> @rongbc I would propose to test this on multiple fs implementations (especially fatfs). When the block size is smaller than the erase block size two approaches are possible: use 1 block per erase block, use a number of blocks per erase block. Some systems (e.g. fatfs) might consider them equal resulting in a erase before a write, which is only supported when 1 block is used per erase block. There is an option (MTD_SECT512) that allows using more 512B blocks per erase block that takes care of the correct erase and copy when enabled. @rongbc I thought this was a more generic change, it seems to be limited to specific boards with their own MTD setup. There is no need to do any further testing as the fatfs is excluded anyhow. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
