arnavsharma990 commented on issue #20037: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/20037#issuecomment-5613599092
> I’ve also considered a possible direction of keeping the deferred-delete state at the open-file-object level rather than using ff_startcluster or directory-entry location as the identity. > > For example, a shared FAT-local open-file object with a reference count and pending-delete state could make the lifetime explicit, with fat_dup() sharing that object. > > I’m mainly looking for confirmation from the maintainers on whether this fits the existing NuttX/FAT design, or if there is a preferred approach I’ve overlooked. @hardik08tripathi-svg lol, I have already written the same thing :-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
