tisonkun commented on code in PR #6643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/6643#discussion_r2418694181
##########
core/src/lib.rs:
##########
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ mod tests {
#[test]
fn assert_size() {
assert_eq!(16, size_of::<Operator>());
- assert_eq!(320, size_of::<Entry>());
- assert_eq!(296, size_of::<Metadata>());
+ assert_eq!(360, size_of::<Entry>());
+ assert_eq!(336, size_of::<Metadata>());
Review Comment:
@BurntSushi Here is somehow a regression that `Timestamp` takes a larger
footprint than `DateTime<Utc>`.
This is also the reason, in ScopeDB, we use a different (more compact)
internal repr for Timestamp and Interval (SignedDuration).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
