yashmayya commented on code in PR #17481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/17481#discussion_r2678818782


##########
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/QueryEnvironment.java:
##########
@@ -236,9 +237,7 @@ private PlannerContext getPlannerContext(SqlNodeAndOptions 
sqlNodeAndOptions) {
         sqlNodeAndOptions.getOptions(), _envConfig, format, 
physicalPlannerContext);
   }
 
-  /// @deprecated Use [#compile] and then 
[plan][CompiledQuery#planQuery(long)] the returned query instead
   @VisibleForTesting
-  @Deprecated

Review Comment:
   I've retained the `VisibleForTesting` annotation, why do we need to keep it 
as deprecated too? The suggestion to `Use [#compile] and then 
[plan][CompiledQuery#planQuery(long)] the returned query instead` also doesn't 
make much sense, because that's exactly what this method is doing, so I don't 
see why it needs to be deprecated when it's just a convenient shortcut.



##########
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/CommonConstants.java:
##########
@@ -623,6 +623,16 @@ public static class Broker {
     // TODO: Change this default to something very high, as this 
_optimnization_ is usually not beneficial.
     public static final int DEFAULT_SORT_EXCHANGE_COPY_THRESHOLD = 10_000;
 
+    /**
+     * Maximum number of elements allowed in an IN clause for multi-stage 
engine queries.
+     * Queries with IN clauses exceeding this limit will be rejected to 
prevent Calcite planner bottlenecks.
+     * A value of 0 or negative disables this validation.
+     * This value can always be overridden by {@link 
Request.QueryOptionKey#MSE_MAX_IN_CLAUSE_ELEMENTS} query option
+     */
+    public static final String CONFIG_OF_MSE_MAX_IN_CLAUSE_ELEMENTS =
+        "pinot.broker.multistage.max.in.clause.elements";
+    public static final int DEFAULT_MSE_MAX_IN_CLAUSE_ELEMENTS = 1000;

Review Comment:
   Yeah, that's a fair point. Do you think we should introduce this knob but 
keep it off by default so that users can tune it as per their workload (if and 
when they run into broker issues with such queries)?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to