xiangfu0 commented on PR #20169:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/20169#issuecomment-6697809929

   Reverted the incidental refactors in f140e9e096: the broker's 
`handleSubquery` and `fixColumnName`, `IdSetSubqueryRewriter`, the server's 
`IN_PARTITIONED_SUBQUERY` name check and `extractLookupTableNames` are back to 
their original form (the server keeps the new row-filter guard), and 
`DeleteStatement` is back to its own list. What is left is 
`RequestUtils.isCrossTableFunction`, the compile-time detection before the 
subquery rewrite, the broker rejection, the server guard and the tests; the PR 
description is updated to match.
   
   _🤖 Addressed by [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)_
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to